On 2016-03-14 10:19, Mark Shinwell wrote:
There is a performance penalty with -g: it makes the raising of
exceptions slower (due to recording of backtraces).   I think that may
be the only difference at present, though I'm not completely sure.

This penalty is only present with OCAMLRUNPARAM=b, which is now on by
default. This is a good thing, because lack of backtraces is something
100% of newcomers trip over; and anyone who dislikes the penalty
can trivially turn it off.

However, -g also inhibits some optimizations along with adding debug info.
So it is still not free.

IMO there should be another option, something like -debug-info, that is
equivalent to -g but does not inhibit any optimizations. Then it would
be enabled by default.


Mark

On 13 March 2016 at 19:16, Ivan Gotovchits <[email protected]> wrote:
It looks like, that currently the `-g` option has no performance cost at all (correct me if I’m wrong). Presumably, there is some increase in the package size, but who cares. With these premises, I think it would be a good policy to distribute packages with `-g` flag enabled.

On Mar 12, 2016, at 4:35 PM, Daniel Bünzli <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello,

I'd like to know what the consensus is about distributing packages that always compile in debug mode. It seems that some persons do want to have debug always enabled [1,2], but the discussion is not clear cut [1].

By default all my packages are released with -g disabled. It seems easy enough to have an opam switch (even the official one) that automatically enables the flag.

So I think OCaml's opam repository should have a policy here. The answer should also take system package managers into account since those pull directly from the tarballs (if this document [3] is still in use for debian it seems they do require compilation with debug mode).

Personally I don't have an opinion about it, I'm rather seeking an answer here.

Best,

Daniel

[1] http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=6728
[2] http://rgrinberg.com/blog/2016/02/26/opam-package-checklist/
[3] http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.html/c305.html#AEN307



--
Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs


--
Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

--
whitequark
_______________________________________________
Platform mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/platform

Reply via email to