platform  

Messages by Thread

• [ocaml-platform] How to inform OPAM's "system" switch about OCaml libraries installed by RPMs? Evgeny Roubinchtein
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] How to inform OPAM's "system" switch about OCaml libraries installed by RPMs? louis . gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] How to inform OPAM's "system" switch about OCaml libraries installed by RPMs? Evgeny Roubinchtein
• [ocaml-platform] Downtime on erratique.ch 2017-01-05 21:00-23:00 UTC Daniel Bünzli
• [ocaml-platform] issue opam-repository#10420: How to properly advertize incompatibility with `-default-safe-string`? Gabriel Scherer
• [ocaml-platform] success with gettext package on macOS ? Tao Stein
• [ocaml-platform] Scheduled downtime of erratique.ch on 2017-03-16 13:00-15:00 UTC Daniel Bünzli
  • [ocaml-platform] [REMINDER] Scheduled downtime of erratique.ch on 2017-03-16 13:00-15:00 UTC Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [ocaml-infra] [REMINDER] Scheduled downtime of erratique.ch on 2017-03-16 13:00-15:00 UTC Malcolm Matalka
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [ocaml-infra] [REMINDER] Scheduled downtime of erratique.ch on 2017-03-16 13:00-15:00 UTC Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [REMINDER] Scheduled downtime of erratique.ch on 2017-03-16 13:00-15:00 UTC Daniel Bünzli
• [ocaml-platform] Counting packages that use specific compiler flags. Kakadu
• Re: [ocaml-platform] [ocaml-infra] OPAM: Depend on particular git commit? Anil Madhavapeddy
• [ocaml-platform] opam show problem Immanuel Litzroth
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam show problem Thomas Gazagnaire
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam show problem Louis Gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam show problem Louis Gesbert
• [ocaml-platform] ocp-index in user-setup David CHEMOUIL
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] ocp-index in user-setup David CHEMOUIL
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] ocp-index in user-setup Louis Gesbert
• [ocaml-platform] list of opam-lib users Anil Madhavapeddy
• [ocaml-platform] new repo proposal: ocaml/ocaml-docker-infra Anil Madhavapeddy
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] new repo proposal: ocaml/ocaml-docker-infra Jon Ludlam
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] new repo proposal: ocaml/ocaml-docker-infra Anil Madhavapeddy
• [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Thomas Gazagnaire
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Anil Madhavapeddy
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Fabrice Le Fessant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Anil Madhavapeddy
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Fabrice Le Fessant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Fabrice Le Fessant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Fabrice Le Fessant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Yaron Minsky
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Anil Madhavapeddy
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Yaron Minsky
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Maintainer notifications for opam-builder -- and other opam-builder enhancements Anil Madhavapeddy
• [ocaml-platform] Improving the opam-repository issue tracker Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Improving the opam-repository issue tracker David Allsopp
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Improving the opam-repository issue tracker Thomas Gazagnaire
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Improving the opam-repository issue tracker Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Improving the opam-repository issue tracker Ivan Gotovchits
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Improving the opam-repository issue tracker Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Improving the opam-repository issue tracker Anil Madhavapeddy
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Improving the opam-repository issue tracker Fabrice Le Fessant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Improving the opam-repository issue tracker Anil Madhavapeddy
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Improving the opam-repository issue tracker Fabrice Le Fessant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Improving the opam-repository issue tracker Anil Madhavapeddy
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Improving the opam-repository issue tracker Anil Madhavapeddy
• [ocaml-platform] problems with ocaml-top Eric DETREZ
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] problems with ocaml-top Ashish Agarwal
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] problems with ocaml-top Louis Gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] problems with ocaml-top Louis Gesbert
• [ocaml-platform] Toying with package installs and documentation Daniel Bünzli
• [ocaml-platform] Checking a constraint for an OCaml class Markus Elfring
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Checking a constraint for an OCaml class Lukasz Stafiniak
• [ocaml-platform] Consequences from pattern matching in function implementations Markus Elfring
• [ocaml-platform] Caching the opam repository Yann Salmon
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Caching the opam repository Louis Gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Caching the opam repository Daniel Bünzli
• [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Simon Cruanes
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Sylvain Le Gall
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Fabrice Le Fessant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Yotam Barnoy
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Yotam Barnoy
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Fabrice Le Fessant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Xavier Leroy
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Fabrice Le Fessant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Alain Frisch
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Fabrice Le Fessant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Alain Frisch
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Hendrik Boom
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Thomas Gazagnaire
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Martin Jambon
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Yaron Minsky
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Alain Frisch
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Sylvain Le Gall
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Alain Frisch
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Fabrice Le Fessant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is it taking too long for OCaml software to become 4.03-compatible? Would release process changes help? Yaron Minsky
• [ocaml-platform] Bytes Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Bytes Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Bytes Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Bytes Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Bytes Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Bytes Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Bytes François Bobot
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Bytes Fabrice Le Fessant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Bytes Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Bytes Fabrice Le Fessant
• [ocaml-platform] Make compatible ocaml, camlp4, ppx, node, js_of_ocaml, ocamlbuild Timur Soft
• [ocaml-platform] Aquamacs detecting incorrect build environment Shrutarshi Basu
• [ocaml-platform] opam without internet access Hendrik Tews
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam without internet access Louis Gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam without internet access Hendrik Tews
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam without internet access Louis Gesbert
• [ocaml-platform] Package compilation and debug mode Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [Caml-list] Package compilation and debug mode Ivan Gotovchits
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [Caml-list] Package compilation and debug mode Mark Shinwell
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [Caml-list] Package compilation and debug mode whitequark
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [Caml-list] Package compilation and debug mode Mark Shinwell
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Package compilation and debug mode Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [Caml-list] Package compilation and debug mode Thomas Gazagnaire
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [Caml-list] Package compilation and debug mode Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [Caml-list] Package compilation and debug mode Daniel Bünzli
• [ocaml-platform] OPAM with OCaml 4.02.1 dllllvm_stubs.so: undefined symbol: del_curterm Joshua Garcia
• [ocaml-platform] OPAM Install of ctypes-foreign fails silently Robert Pickering
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM Install of ctypes-foreign fails silently Jeremy Yallop
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM Install of ctypes-foreign fails silently Anil Madhavapeddy
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM Install of ctypes-foreign fails silently Robert Pickering
• [ocaml-platform] github:ocaml/ocamlbuild? Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] github:ocaml/ocamlbuild? Thomas Gazagnaire
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] github:ocaml/ocamlbuild? Fabrice Le Fessant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] github:ocaml/ocamlbuild? Thomas Gazagnaire
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] github:ocaml/ocamlbuild? François Bobot
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] github:ocaml/ocamlbuild? Ashish Agarwal
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] github:ocaml/ocamlbuild? Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] github:ocaml/ocamlbuild? Ashish Agarwal
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] github:ocaml/ocamlbuild? François Bobot
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] github:ocaml/ocamlbuild? Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] github:ocaml/ocamlbuild? Anil Madhavapeddy
• [ocaml-platform] Is there a Travis check expert in the room? Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is there a Travis check expert in the room? Thomas Gazagnaire
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is there a Travis check expert in the room? Gabriel Scherer
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is there a Travis check expert in the room? Thomas Gazagnaire
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is there a Travis check expert in the room? Anil Madhavapeddy
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Is there a Travis check expert in the room? Gabriel Scherer
• [ocaml-platform] 4.02.3 ocamldoc breakage Daniel Bünzli
• [ocaml-platform] opam update problem Bruce Butterfield
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam update problem Thomas Gazagnaire
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam update problem Bruce Butterfield
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam update problem Thomas Gazagnaire
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam update problem Francois Berenger
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam update problem Louis Gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam update problem Bruce Butterfield
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam update problem Shon Feder
• [ocaml-platform] Identifying windows ports for build systems & cross compiling distinctions Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [wg-windows] Identifying windows ports for build systems & cross compiling distinctions David Allsopp
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [wg-windows] Identifying windows ports for build systems & cross compiling distinctions Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [wg-windows] Identifying windows ports for build systems & cross compiling distinctions Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [wg-windows] Identifying windows ports for build systems & cross compiling distinctions Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] [wg-windows] Identifying windows ports for build systems & cross compiling distinctions Daniel Bünzli
• [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository Hannes Mehnert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository David Sheets
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository Hannes Mehnert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository David Sheets
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository Hannes Mehnert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository Török Edwin
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository Hannes Mehnert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository Francois Berenger
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository Hannes Mehnert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository Louis Gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository Louis Gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository Thomas Gazagnaire
  • [ocaml-platform] OPAM: signing the repository Amir Chaudhry
• [ocaml-platform] opam drybuild? Christoph Höger
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] opam drybuild? Louis Gesbert
• [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Trevor Smith
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Ashish Agarwal
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Louis Gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Ashish Agarwal
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Daniel Bünzli
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Trevor Smith
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Thomas Gazagnaire
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Trevor Smith
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Trevor Smith
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Thomas Gazagnaire
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Trevor Smith
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Louis Gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Trevor Smith
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Louis Gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Trevor Smith
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Trevor Smith
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Trevor Smith
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Louis Gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Ashish Agarwal
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Louis Gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Louis Gesbert
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Malcolm Matalka
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Thomas Braibant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Trevor Smith
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Thomas Braibant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Trevor Smith
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Thomas Braibant
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Ashish Agarwal
  • Re: [ocaml-platform] Dev Version as Package? Thomas Braibant

• Earlier messages