On Sunday 11 of December 2005 12:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It's ok as long, as we make ISO-s from time to time. I can't see what's blah blah blah > bothering ppl bout dying ac and th. Windows 98 and 95 and ME died as well, > other distros also make new versions and move on forward. There is no need PLD != MS Windows > really doesnt matter to me, if we make th, then th1.5, th2.0 and so on, or > if we name future ISO-s or relases with new names. Generally whatever, but let jut RMs and CDG do the job ok ?
--
Daniel Dominik Rudnicki
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpxItZmfmDKO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
