Tomasz Pala wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 08:52:36 -0500, Andrew A. Gill wrote: > >> That's a very ugly solution. I haven't been following this >> init.d discussion too closely, but what you're proposing is >> ugly. > > Daemons shouldn't die and they don't without any reason. I've got only > one broken - ospf, if you have more you should revise system > configuration and hardware. > Generally speaking there's no common need for watching over services, > thus I don't see much interest in switching startup scripts.
NMB dies when it runs out of network interfaces. That's stupid but is considered a feature by samba developers... Supervising daemons could allow creating an easy GUI control panel for them, informing the admin about problems. The startup time with init-ng is proved to be less than a half compared to plain SysVinit. -- Regards, Jakub Piotr Cłapa _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
