Dnia Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:56:55 +0100, Tomasz Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
> Anyway I simply do not believe, that > it's 'proven' to be two times faster, especially when speaking of > machines which have some real load. I'm testing it right now on my laptop( yea - it doesn't have this much load, but it runnes few server-like daemons, like apache and mysql + pgsql ). The boot speeds up *really*! X starts in like < 10sec from powering on the laptop! The problem is with tracing what runns and what doesn't. Since all starts parallel, there is a lot of output and things start in different places, sometimes between of other msgs. I think also we need to make the scripts use not binnary logic, but trinary > more. Why? Example: I've forgot to connect my pen and mount outputed an error, which resulted in failure of running the mounting init script, which stopped > 50% of the system from running, which is insane! We need a third state, that it generally did it's job, but there were errors. This way other thins would boot (like mysql, apache etc...) and some could fail indeed (like a partition where I keep apache wasn't mounted etc..), but we'll get the system up, because otherwise we could end up not allowing logins because of some minor errors. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to The Dark Side" - Yoda _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
