On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 19:55:39 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The equasion is simple - I see new functionality added, few new fatures, > faster boot and nothing taken - so, where is the problem? You get the same > thing, that earlier, but faster and better - where is the problem?
So please answer to all my issues from other mails (network/quagga/routing concern, service reload from logrotate...). The problem is: - unpredictable behaviour upon system failure (I'd prefer not to restart *sql after some recoverable cluster error, because it may hide problem and all I get are problems with synchronizing timelines), - more failure points (now service means service, not also some deps), - more complicated management scheme - how to TEST my own services on production machine? Playing doom-admin? Check all the scenarios? It's nice solution for fast system startup (but I doubt it's signifficant change - do me a favour and add '&' at the end of /etc/rc.d/rc line 213 to check it please). Process supervising if configurable can be nice feature too, but for me it's not worth risking mass murder by supervisor bug. I do trust init and that's all. -- GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar> http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/ http://tccs.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
