On Thursday 31 August 2006 17:26, havner wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:10:50PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > %package headers > > Provides: kernel-i2c-devel > > Obsoletes: kernel-i2c-devel > > If that worked as it should you wouldn't have conflicts but proper > obsoletes. what is "should work" ? ;)
if each kernel-headers provides kernel-i2c-devel and other one obsoletes, surely it would be marked as removed. for the resolution i suggest removing 'Provides: kernel-i2c-devel' so other package Obsolete: wouldn't mark (all!) kernel-headers packages > > > They only do if its the same kernel version, > > > different release, otherwise they go to /usr/src/linux-$version and > > > everything is fine. > > > > are you suggesting it's poldek bug? > > I'm not suggesting anything :-) > I just know i had kernel-build for 2 kernels installed at the same > moment without any conflicts (some recent 2.6). I remember changing > /usr/src/linux symlink for building modules for different kernels and i > dont use nodeps/force. So it seems it was ok. did you use poldek (like me) or rpm to install (-i) or rpm upgrade (-U)? _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
