Dnia 31-08-2006, czw o godzinie 19:28 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe napisał(a): > On Thursday 31 August 2006 17:26, havner wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:10:50PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > %package headers > > > Provides: kernel-i2c-devel > > > Obsoletes: kernel-i2c-devel > > > > If that worked as it should you wouldn't have conflicts but proper > > obsoletes. > what is "should work" ? ;) > > if each kernel-headers provides kernel-i2c-devel and other one obsoletes, > surely it would be marked as removed. > > for the resolution i suggest removing 'Provides: kernel-i2c-devel' so other > package Obsolete: wouldn't mark (all!) kernel-headers packages
Isn't it possible to write Obsoletes: kernel-i2c-devel < 2.6.0? -- Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLD Linux _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
