On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:07:32PM +0200, Mariusz Mazur wrote: > Dnia poniedziałek, 14 maja 2007, Jan Rekorajski napisał: > > That's what I did, just the other way, files copied to packages/* and > > symlinked to SPECS/ and SOURCES/. Easy to make the script do it the > > other way. > > Do it the other way then. Until we figure out a permanent packages/* > structure, the old specs/sources tree should be the main one. > > Btw: not sure if hardlinks aren't a bad idea. How would cvsadmins handle > renaming packages with the new stuff?
hardlinks probably are. I bet cvs won't handle them and just will leave two different files. server-side symlinks generally work with cvs. [...] > Alternatively we can just start with a subset of all the packages. Maybe > k*.spec? Considering that we'd have to test the scripts before making a full > deployment, that sounds ok, right? p* ;P (to check scalability and check when perl/php/python* interested developers go mad when updating packages in 1k dirs ;>) -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
