> have 'packages/%{name}' containt (a) the spec file, (b) a 'files' subdir,
> that
> contains the traditional 'SOURCES' content and (c) any other files containing
> metadata. Off the top of my head -- the 'tag->revision' file we've discussed
> wrt to svn migration. And in the future -- any other metadata that might
> prove usefull (with the ability to just add a file with some interesting info
> regarding a package, the possibilities are quite big; sooner or later
> someone's bound to use it for builder/ftp/bugzilla/somethingelse
> integration).
>
This or flat makes the most sense to me.
If we're reorganizing on this scale, though, any reason not to move to
SVN in the process?
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
