On Saturday 20 of December 2008, wrobell wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 02:04:39PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote: > > > > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of > > > > > ac bcond in xulrunner.spec? > > > > > > > > I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or > > > > some simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so > > > > simple things. > > > > > > it is messy as you need to look at distro line i 3 ways > > > - trunk (no changes) > > > - ac branch > > > - and now ac bcond > > > > No, there should be always AC branch/tag for last version that s prepared > > for AC. > > It's easier to move tag/branch than merge changes. > > i really don't mind until specs get messy. your choice guys. > > so just to state it loud. we do allow distro line bconds like "ra", "ac", > and "ti". there shall be no "th" bconds as it is trunk forever.
Prepare for "arekm" and "companyiworkfor" conditions, too! (joke... for now) -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
