On Monday 22 December 2008 20:43:48 wrobell wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > On Monday 22 December 2008 11:22:42 wrobell wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: > > > > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote: > > > > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of > > > > > ac bcond in xulrunner.spec? > > > > > > > > I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or > > > > some simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so > > > > simple things. > > > > > > one question, though. if one of the distro lines dies, then who is > > > going to clean up the conditionals introduced by such distro line? > > > > you can always do cvs annotate and ask whoever added it... > > to be honest, that's too optymistic statement. but... will you?
i'l complete the sentence: "and ask whoever added it, whether you can remove it". i don't say how things should be, i just say how they are... -- glen _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
