On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Patryk Zawadzki <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would opt for this solution. We had many problems previously due to >> removing >> py files and py files are very usefull when debugging or working with python >> libraries. Again with this stupid argument? Will we also pack C/C++ sources in packages, because they are useful for debugging?
> +1, lots of software depends on being able to find .py files (plugin > discovery) So lots of software is broken by design. What else is new? > and sources are often the only source of (up to date) > documentation. So the source code is the documentation. What else is new? Are you simply trolling, or just are too ignorant to be aware that's also what happens with all other programming languages? > I currently keep a lot of source packages around in my > home dir because files coming from PLD packages are only readable to > python itself. Your point beign? You want to have source code, you have to get it by yourself, and not rely on the distribution to bend to your nonsensical needs. What's next? Kernel people requiring full kernel sources in main package, because they do some work with them? Shadzik wanting to package full KDE source code in our packages, so that he can apply patches with less effort? Oh wait, at least that's not going to happen anymore. > Patryk Zawadzki > I solve problems. wolf I ROTFL at PZ. _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
