On Apr 3, 2011, at 9:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Jeff Johnson wrote: >> Another approach would be to not bother with static *.py* content >> packaged in *.rpm at all, but rather let python establish its own >> format/implementation for install/upgrade/erase of python code. > > This approach would break the main PLD rule: that all binaries present in > the system are registered in the rpm database. >
rules == rules So teach python to do a registration. That's already being done with pubkeys and rpm --import: create a header, call rpmdbAdd(). 73 de Jeff _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
