2011/4/9 Elan Ruusamäe <[email protected]>: > so my vote goes for keeping the old .py[co] method, and perhaps change to > make is package only .pyc, it is rather ratre somebody invokes python with > -O option so the .pyo is to be needed. or why it was packaged in first > place? to get files owned in case somebody invokes as root and .pyo gets > created? perhaps package .pyc as regular files and .pyo as ghosted then.
Not sure about PLD but I suppose we just followed what the others were doing. Other distros did it this way so they could set proper selinux attributes. -- Patryk Zawadzki I solve problems. _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
