On Tuesday 31 of May 2011, Tomasz Pala wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 19:53:52 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: > >> No one was brave enough to rebuild all dependencies on ftp.pld- which > >> would be required if la were dropped. > > So basically every *.la file that can be safely removed (packages with > *.pc) and is not required by any package we got might be removed without > any rebuilds? I mean - if some outer la file was polluted it would be > seen in rpm requires list, right?
In theory. I guess there are cases when it will be in .la but not in requires. > And the full list doesn't look scarry either: There are few which don't build at the moment at all, so... -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
