On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 03:12:11PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Tuesday 31 of May 2011, Tomasz Pala wrote: > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 19:53:52 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: > > >> No one was brave enough to rebuild all dependencies on ftp.pld- which > > >> would be required if la were dropped. > > > > So basically every *.la file that can be safely removed (packages with > > *.pc) and is not required by any package we got might be removed without > > any rebuilds? I mean - if some outer la file was polluted it would be > > seen in rpm requires list, right? > > In theory. I guess there are cases when it will be in .la but not in requires.
Is libtool(...) dependency generation enabled again in Th? I saw it's been disabled some time ago... unfortunately. It should be enabled even when the policy is to drop most of the *.la files - it will allow to catch packages needing rebuild. The same for pkgconfig(...) dependencies - it shouldn't be disabled. -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
