On Monday 01 of November 2004 21:43, havner wrote: > > sqlite version 3.0.8 *not* sqlite3 version 3.0.8. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] havner $ rpm -ql sqlite3-devel | grep lib > /usr/lib/libsqlite3.la > /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so > /usr/lib/pkgconfig/sqlite3.pc And here we see library name not package name, so at least your commit log is incorrect.
> > There packages were prepared according to our rules - see db.spec, > > db4.spec, db3.spec, db2.spec, db1.spec. Did these rules changed? - if > > yes, then we need to fix all db* spec files. > > > > Now revert what you broke or move to AC-branch. > > I won't revert it. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS $ grep sqlite db* rotfl ;) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS $ > > I will fix db* if you'll point me what to fix. We need clear rule first (or not and everyone makes what he thinks is best). db are named in the way that: - db.spec contains latest version - dbX.spec contains db-X.Y.Z library (and which is not latest) gtk+ on the other hand is different: - gtk+.spec - old 1.X - gtk+2.spec - new 2.X 3.X would be gtk+3.spec You seem to follow gtk+ rule names. If we will follow gtk+ rulles then we need to: mv db.spec db42.spec; mv db1.spec db.spec and stop doing these ugly hacks with soname changes (that were introduced to get easy -ldb linking). -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
