On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:57:15PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> db are named in the way that:
> - db.spec contains latest version
> - dbX.spec contains db-X.Y.Z library (and which is not latest)
> 
> gtk+ on the other hand is different:
> - gtk+.spec - old 1.X
> - gtk+2.spec - new 2.X
> 3.X would be gtk+3.spec
> 
> You seem to follow gtk+ rule names. If we will follow gtk+ rulles then we need 
> to: mv db.spec db42.spec; mv db1.spec db.spec and stop doing these ugly hacks 
> with soname changes (that were introduced to get easy -ldb linking).

gtk+ way is more logical for me. No problems with upgrade and no further
changes in package names. I did sqlite this way to provide clean
upgrade. Maybe commit log was not appropriate, but like I said I'm very
tired and you would understand if you tried a little.

-- 
Regards       Havner                          http://livecd.pld-linux.org
GG: 2846839                             jid,mail: havner(at)pld-linux.org
          "We live as we dream, alone"   - Joseph Conrad

_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Reply via email to