On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:49:02PM +0200, baggins wrote:
> > Author: baggins Date: Wed Sep 21 11:49:02 2011 GMT
> > Module: packages Tag: HEAD
> > ---- Log message:
> > - static R: zlib-static
> >
> > ---- Files affected:
> > packages/binutils:
> > binutils.spec (1.349 -> 1.350)
> >
> > ---- Diffs:
> >
> > ================================================================
> > Index: packages/binutils/binutils.spec
> > diff -u packages/binutils/binutils.spec:1.349
> > packages/binutils/binutils.spec:1.350
> > --- packages/binutils/binutils.spec:1.349 Sat Aug 6 08:15:17 2011
> > +++ packages/binutils/binutils.spec Wed Sep 21 13:48:57 2011
> > @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@
> > Summary(pl.UTF-8): Biblioteki statyczne do GNU binutils
> > Group: Development/Libraries
> > Requires: %{name}-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
> > +Requires: zlib-static
>
> Statyczne linkowanie z libbfd (czy innymi) nie wymusza statycznego
> linkowania ze zlibem czy glibc.
> Czyli zależność R: zlib-devel w zupełności wystarcza.
>
> Podobnie w gdb-lib powinno wystarczyć R: python-devel.
Powiedz to autorom freepascala.
--
Jan Rękorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-pl mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-pl
