Dnia Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:37:48 +0100 użyszkodnik Paweł Sikora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
> On Tuesday 02 of March 2004 20:29, Jakub Bogusz wrote: [--ciach--] > > ja znalazlem jeszcze taka ciekawostke... > > "The most interesting case I've seen of thwarting the compatibility > deals > with distributing components which use a 'middle man' to achieve > the license bridge. > > Suppose you have Component G, which is GPL, and Component X, > which is under the retarded XFree86 License. > You want the two to interoperate somehow. > > Create an interface written from scratch to form a common bridge > between components G and X, derived neither from G nor X. > We'll call this one Component B, and license it under the BSD > license. > > Create an implementation of the B interface for component G, > and call this Component GB. Release this under the GPL, > which is acceptable because B is licensed under the BSD license, > which is compatible with the GPL. > > Create another implementation of the B interface, this time for > component X, and call this one Component XB. Release this under the > XFree86 license. This should be a lot simpler to prove legal because > the XFree86 license has less restrictions overall than the GPL. > > So now you have three components which form a bridge: > G <-> GB <-> B <-> XB <-> X " > O rety, to w tłumaczeniu na polski to brzmi mniej więcej tak: Chcemy dojechać z Łodzi do Krakowa. Więc zamiast jechać katowicką robimy tak: Jedziemy Warszawy, wsiadamy w samolot do Pekinu, w Pekinie, bierzemy autobus na najbliższy przystanek koleji transsyberyjskiej, koleją dojeżdzamy do Moskwy,w Moskwie wsiadamy w taksówke i jedziemy znów do Warszawy, gdzie wsiadamy w pociąg do Gdańska i przesiadamy się tam na pociąg w kierunku Poznania i wysiadamy w Czerwonaku idać dalej pieszo, ufff... BP, MSPANC -- DeeJay1
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
