On Saturday 31 of July 2004 00:02, Mariusz Mazur wrote: > Znalezione na rpm-list. > > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > > Subject: Re: rpm: bzip2 compressed payload > Date: piątek 30 lipiec 2004 17:18 > From: Jeff Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: RPM Package Manager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 12:36:50PM -0700, Wichmann, Mats D wrote: > > Can anyone tell me under what circumstances > > bzip2 is chosen to compress the payload? > > bzip2 is chosen if configured in the build system. > > I have never ever seen a package released with a bzip2 > payload, mainly because bzip2 is 5-7 times slower than > zlib, and has a larger memory footprint with -9 compression > (-9 for bzip2 means use a 900K buffer, -9 for zlib means > something else entirely). No to niech zobaczy PLD - znalezione w: http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/SOURCES/rpm.macros 1.27 Thu Sep 14 23:55:52 2000 by kloczek CVS Tags: rpm-3_0_5-11_91 Diffs to 1.26 Change default binary packages compresion payloads:
%_binary_payload w9.bzdio Example: binary rpm packages summary size after switch to w9.bzdio makes ~10% output smaller: w9.gzdio 1839645 w9.bzdio 1670818 ~10% smaller vs. 5 -7 times slower -- Tomasz Wittner _______________________________________________ pld-devel-pl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-pl
