On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:05:27PM +0100, Mateusz Korniak wrote: > On Tuesday 06 of December 2005 09:01, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:19:35PM +0100, Mateusz Korniak wrote: > > > Robie: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ping 192.168.5.1 > > > > > > I na drugiej sesji widze: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# tcpdump -n -i eth0 > > > > # tcpdump -eni eth0 ? > > Wielkie dzięki za podpowiedź. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# tcpdump -eni eth0 icmp > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode > listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes > 21:56:12.341140 00:10:d7:0a:00:00 > 00:0b:6a:b6:19:7a, ethertype IPv4 > (0x0800), length 98: IP 192.168.5.253 > 192.168.5.1: icmp 64: echo request > seq 8 > 21:56:12.341487 00:0b:6a:b6:19:7a > 00:02:a5:43:81:89, ethertype IPv4 > (0x0800), length 98: IP 192.168.5.1 > 192.168.5.253: icmp 64: echo reply seq > 8 > > > Teraz pytanie brzmi dlaczego mój natujący komputer (192.168.5.1) wysyła > odpowiedź na inny MAC adres .. niż ma w tabeli arp [1] ?!? > > [1] > # arp -n > Address HWtype HWaddress Flags Mask > Iface > 192.168.5.253 ether 00:10:D7:0A:00:00 C > eth0 > 83.230.19.129 ether 00:02:A5:43:81:89 C > eth0
Hm.. Poprosze wynik `ip a l', `route -n', `arp -an' z maszyn 192.168.5.1 i 192.168.5.253. -- best regards q# _______________________________________________ pld-users-pl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-users-pl
