On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Nick Behnken wrote: > Ramon, I'm not arguing with you, cause I know your right.. But can you > explain why a thread wouldn't work? My assumption was that the thread would > get an equal amount of cpu time as the emulator thread, Your assumption is wrong. Schedulers aren't so predictable!!! It would get a *roughly* similar amount of CPU time, but that's not accurate enough. Anyway, I see no benefit in using a different thread in the first place... -- Ramon
- Re: emulating RDTSC Kevin Lawton
- Re: emulating RDTSC Ulrich Weigand
- RE: emulating RDTSC Drew Northup
- Re: emulating RDTSC Corin Talkobt
- Re: emulating RDTSC Mark Zealey
- Re: emulating RDTSC Mark Zealey
- SV: emulating RDTSC John B�ckstrand
- SV: emulating RDTSC John B�ckstrand
- Re: emulating RDTSC Ramon van Handel
- Re: emulating RDTSC Nick Behnken
- RE: emulating RDTSC Ramon van Handel
- RE: emulating RDTSC John B�ckstrand
- RE: emulating RDTSC Norbert Schulz
- Re: emulating RDTSC Nick Behnken
- Re: emulating RDTSC Ramon van Handel
