On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Nick Behnken wrote:

> Ramon, I'm not arguing with you, cause I know your right.. But can you
> explain why a thread wouldn't work?  My assumption was that the thread would
> get an equal amount of cpu time as the emulator thread,

Your assumption is wrong.  Schedulers aren't so predictable!!!
It would get a *roughly* similar amount of CPU time, but that's
not accurate enough.  Anyway, I see no benefit in using a different
thread in the first place...

-- Ramon


Reply via email to