Has anyone else had problems loading the kernel module under 2.4.0-test11?
Every time I try to insmod it, it segfaults. Here's the entry from 
/var/log/messages...

Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 
virtual address 00000f27 
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel:  printing eip: 
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: ca82404c 
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: *pde = 00000000 
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: Oops: 0002 
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: CPU:    0 
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: EIP:    0010:[<ca82404c>] 
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: EFLAGS: 00010282 
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: eax: 00000f27   ebx: ca824000   ecx: c0257440   edx: 
c0257440 
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: esi: ca82404c   edi: 00000000   ebp: 00022e60   esp: 
c6a5df1c 
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018 
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: Process insmod (pid: 747, stackpage=c6a5d000) 
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: Stack: c0118d4d c6a5c000 0804f208 ca824000 bffffc3c 
00000000 00000000 00000007  
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel:        00000000 0000004c c6a5df60 c67c1000 00022680 
00000006 c67c2000 ffffffea  
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel:        c73b22e0 00000060 c0256460 ca824060 00022e60 
00000000 00000000 00000000  
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: Call Trace: [qm_symbols+301/496] [<ca824000>] 
[<ca824060>] [lcall7+35/76] [<ca824000>]  
Dec 11 17:15:36 localhost kernel: Code: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
00 00 00 00 00  

Then, annoyingly, the module is listed under lsmod as being
uninitialized- if I try to rmmod it, it says the device or resource
is busy.

Anyone else experiancing this?

thanks,

scott olsson


---
"If I have seen farther than others, it is because I was standing on the 
shoulders of giants." - Isaac Newton

"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my 
shoulders." - Hal Abelson

"If I have seen farther than others, it is because I have been surrounded by 
midgets." - Murray Gell-Mann



Reply via email to