On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 08:37:22PM -0500, Drew Northup wrote: > > > So back to your comment. GPL was _not_ acceptable > > > to previous relationships of mine, and LGPL was > > > the one people voted most for. > > > > But why isn't it acceptable _now_? It can be changed easily. > > You don't change the license to a project with the same nonchalance as > turing on a light-switch. We agreed on the license already--and you > implicitly agreed to it when you joined the project. End of agrument.
I don't call this a real argument, but I shut up about it because you insist keeping the LGPL. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
