Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> 
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>https://plf.zarb.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-12-12 15:34 -------
>>>Could someone please remove this package?
>>> 
>>>
>>
>>Good idea... I've tried to build the latest version, but I can't get it
>>to compile.
> 
> drip has been unbuildable for ages, and I also agree it should be
> dropped. Its last build is two years old: Mon 03 Nov 2003
> 
> But if you look at other old package that also don't build anymore, drip
> is not the only case:
> http://plf.zarb.org/qa/build.html

Is this the 10.2 or the cooker build? In case of the (2006 &) cooker
build, a lot of packages have issues with gcc-4 issues. These could be
fixed (by somebody who knows what they are doing). I therefore think its
better to look at the 10.2 packages (pre gcc-4) and identify the
packages to be dropped from there. There is still some hope for the
others :-)

> http://plf.zarb.org/qa/age.html
> 
> Which make me think we have a general problem here...
> 
> I'd really like to achieve a sane working flow here, instead of living
> with it as we all do in mandriva world. If we can't fix packages, we
> should drop it than keeping them broken indefinitly. Sofar, each package
> has a maintainer, who should either assume responsability for it, or
> drop maintainership for it.
> 
> We have tools for reporting problems (bugzilla and rpmcheck), we have
> tools for exchanging/dropping maintainership (bugzilla packager status),
> we have editable packaging documentation. We don't have sofar automated
> package deletion, nor even maintainer-accessible package deletion, but
> plf admins are more often requested to delete wrong upload than outdated
> packages, which make me think we have a social problem (how should we
> deal with the problem) rather than a technical one.
> 
> So, what should we do there ?
_______________________________________________
PLF-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss

Reply via email to