Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>>>Good idea... I've tried to build the latest version, but I can't get it
>>>to compile.
>>
>>drip has been unbuildable for ages, and I also agree it should be
>>dropped. Its last build is two years old: Mon 03 Nov 2003
>>
>>But if you look at other old package that also don't build anymore, drip
>>is not the only case:
>>http://plf.zarb.org/qa/build.html
>
>
> Is this the 10.2 or the cooker build?
All QA is done on the cooker tree only, the one we use for
adding/removing packages.
> In case of the (2006 &) cooker
> build, a lot of packages have issues with gcc-4 issues. These could be
> fixed (by somebody who knows what they are doing). I therefore think its
> better to look at the 10.2 packages (pre gcc-4) and identify the
> packages to be dropped from there. There is still some hope for the
> others :-)
I didn't advocated dropping right now all package with build problems,
but rather responsabilising maintainers to finding a solution. After
all, if no one cares about fixing them right now, it is unlikely someone
else will fix them later.
--
Why is it called a TV "set" when you only get one?
-- Why Why Why n°39
_______________________________________________
PLF-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
