2005/12/26, Richard Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That seems to me like a bug. PLF should integrate with 2006 official - > so any packages in plf should either > - be built against 2006 official (1) > or > - be in plf-devel (2) > or > - have their dependencies in plf (3) > I'd favour (3), i.e. where a plf package really needs a library which is > newer than the version in 2006 official, the library ought to be > included in PLF.
Hi, I disagree, we have the option to backport packages to the stable distributions. PLF should not be the place for packages that could go to contribs instead. > I've seen this happen also with gtkpod, which has a dependency on > libgpod which is nowhere to be seen. libgpod is in the contribs for 10.1 10.2 and 2006.0 community. It is written on the plf page, you need the devel contribs. -- Terminate Schwarzenegger _______________________________________________ PLF-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
