Götz Waschk wrote:
> 2006/1/26, Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>>have you uploaded the source rpm only? There's nothing else on the mirrors.
>>
>>I uploaded x86_64.
>>I don't ahve acceess to an i586 machine and the chroots were down.
>
>
> So you have built the x86_64 package on your private machine? Is there
> a policy I haven't heard of? My i586 packages must come from the plf
> chroot.
As long as we can't provide x86_64 chroots, there will be no other
solution than building them with your own resources. And there no
enforcement yet of buildhost even for i586...
--
Never share a foxhole with anyone braver than you are
-- Murphy's Military Laws n°9
_______________________________________________
PLF-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-announce] [RPM] x264-0.44.409-1plf Götz Waschk
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-announce] [RPM] x264-0.44.409... Austin
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-announce] [RPM] x264-0.44... Götz Waschk
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-announce] [RPM] x264-... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-announce] [RPM] x264-... Anssi Hannula
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-announce] [RPM] x... Götz Waschk
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-announce] [R... Anssi Hannula
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-announce... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-announce] [R... Olivier Thauvin
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-announce... Götz Waschk
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-anno... Anssi Hannula
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-anno... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-anno... Pascal Terjan
- Re: [Plf-discuss] [PLF-announce] [RPM] x264-... Austin Acton
