Austin Acton wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 15:07 +0200, Anssi Hannula wrote: > >>This is a general problem with PLF reps and the way urpmi handles >>biarch. The PLF x86_64 rpms are often not in sync with i586 rpms, thus >>urpmi tries to install the newer i586 ones even if they have >>dependencies on unavailable packages. > > > Which is not the case with smart. > > Is there no way we could add a feature to urpmi to avoid this? Just a > simple setting in /etc/urpmi that would only overwrite packages with the > same arch. >
I use urpmi --auto-select --strict-arch to update my packages. -- Anssi Hannula _______________________________________________ PLF-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
