On Tuesday 28 November 2006 3:21 am, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Kjetil Skjønberg wrote: > > On 11/27/06, *Guillaume Rousse* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Way back for Mandrake 10.1, a package called digger was in plf > > > > >Due to legal changes in France, we recently removed all packages for > > >which we had no clue about why it was present in PLF. Seems this > > >packages was part of the purge victims. > > > > It would seem like "Digger Remastered" is legal and GPL'ed, however the > > original "Digger" is classified as abandonware. > > So imho there shouldn't be any problems packaging "Digger Remastered". > > Sure, if the packager just comply to the rule of adding it in package > description.
So, to get this back into plf, should I repackage it myself? What rule does the packager need to comply with in order for it to be accepted? Does it need have "Digger Remastered" in the description? Regards Glen Ogilvie
pgpz4gHU0KPTD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ PLF-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
