Hi Per, Do you happen to still have a copy of the srpm or spec file you used to build digger?
I think it would be called digger-20020314-4plf.src.rpm I did not remove digger from plf, but am asking the people who run plf to include it again, as it's now called "Digger Remastered" and legal according to the author, who has been in contact with the original author of the DOS version of digger. Regards Glen Ogilvie New Zealand. On Wednesday 29 November 2006 12:03 am, you wrote: > Tirsdag 28 november 2006 11:07, skrev Glen Ogilvie: > > Hi Per, > > > > Not sure if you watch this mailing list, but we are discussing a package > > you built for mandrake 10.1, digger. > > hoi! > > Please don't remove digger, it's in plf due to it being abandonware with > uncertainty about copyright of windmill (it's as good as a-okay, but as > it's only "as good as" I've put it in plf), please repackage it if you're > able to :) > > > On Tuesday 28 November 2006 3:21 am, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > > Kjetil Skjønberg wrote: > > > > On 11/27/06, *Guillaume Rousse* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > >Way back for Mandrake 10.1, a package called digger was in plf > > > > > > > > > >Due to legal changes in France, we recently removed all packages > > > > > for which we had no clue about why it was present in PLF. Seems > > > > > this packages was part of the purge victims. > > > > > > > > It would seem like "Digger Remastered" is legal and GPL'ed, however > > > > the original "Digger" is classified as abandonware. > > > > So imho there shouldn't be any problems packaging "Digger > > > > Remastered". > > > > > > Sure, if the packager just comply to the rule of adding it in package > > > description. > > > > So, to get this back into plf, should I repackage it myself? > > > > What rule does the packager need to comply with in order for it to be > > accepted? Does it need have "Digger Remastered" in the description? > > > > Regards > > Glen Ogilvie > > New Zealand
pgphHHR8nyD2B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ PLF-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
