On 28 June 2010 09:24, Anssi Hannula <[email protected]> wrote: > Ahmad Samir kirjoitti keskiviikko, 23. kesäkuuta 2010 17:41:11: >> On 23 June 2010 17:06, Joao S. O. Bueno <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Frederik Himpe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Flash 10 as downloaded by the flash-player-plugin is vulernable to >> >> serious security problems. Please update it to version 10.1. >> >> >> >> http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb10-14.html >> > >> > The last I knew about this, there was a rproblem that they didn't have >> > a 64bit version of Flash 10.1. Had they fixed that? >> >> AFAIK, no, they removed the download link for the 64bit Alpha player >> from the Adobe labs site: >> http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10_64bit.html >> (however if you have the direct the download link you can still >> download it, i.e. the PLF 64bit flash rpm should still work). >> >> That doesn't mean that the 32bit flash PLF package shouldn't be updated. > > ...which I did on 11.6., shortly after the update was released. >
Which I could have checked before posting. Noted for next time :) > -- > Anssi Hannula > _______________________________________________ > PLF-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss > -- Ahmad Samir _______________________________________________ PLF-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
