On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:27 PM, T. Kim Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm sure there would be wide support for allowing existing Poi on plone.org > to continue being used, and not allowing new Poi to be created on plone.org. > > If Poi eventually are to be shut off entirely on plone.org then it would be > good to have a moderately decent export / import mechanism; I have no idea if > there is such a thing today, however.
>> We can and should be smart about the software we commit ourselves to >> maintain. Our community time, energy and ingenuity is valuable and >> should be focused on making a better CMS, not supporting and maintaining >> a very old, and passable but not terribly good issue tracker. Our >> users' time, energy, and experience is also very valuable and should be >> cared for when they report problems with or request features of the >> add-ons they use. It is not only appropriate, but important for all of >> this to be taken into account when asking the kind of questions being >> asked here. It is also appropriate and important to be asking these >> kinds of questions. >> >> Ros Ross, Kim- Thanks, obviously you see where this conversation could be headed. ;-) I'm trying hard not to jump to any conclusions, though, so... to push you to answer a more specific question: As an add-on product dev/contributor, are there any specific Poi instances you are the owner or a significant user of that you, personally, would be sorry to see go away? :jon _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
