Alan W. Irwin wrote: >Hi Orion: > >Thanks for finding this. > >Note, the present version should work because the effect of > > common /zzplstr6/ string6 > common /zzplstr6/ string7 > common /zzplstr6/ string8 > common /zzplstr6/ string9 > >is identical to > > common /zzplstr6/ string6, string7, string8, string9 > >However, I also suspect repeating the 6 is just a typo, and it is a little >cleaner to keep the common blocks separate so your patch should probably be >applied. Arjen, do you agree? > > > Hi Alan,
it must have been a typo indeed - it is at the very least much cleaner to use unique names. What is more, I am not even sure that the effect you describe on the code with the typo is indeed correct (I have not used COMMON blocks in years and there are a lot of obscure areas there ...) Well, to cut a long story short: we will use unique names - period. Regards, Arjen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
