Here is the compare status as of revision 9212. c++ Missing examples : Differing postscript output : Missing stdout : Differing stdout : f77 Missing examples : Differing postscript output : Missing stdout : Differing stdout : f95 Missing examples : Differing postscript output : Missing stdout : Differing stdout : java Missing examples : 19 Differing postscript output : Missing stdout : Differing stdout : octave Missing examples : 19 Differing postscript output : Missing stdout : Differing stdout : python Missing examples : 19 Differing postscript output : Missing stdout : Differing stdout : tcl Missing examples : 19 Differing postscript output : 11 13 15 16 20 Missing stdout : Differing stdout : perl Missing examples : Differing postscript output : Missing stdout : Differing stdout : 31 ada Missing examples : 31 Differing postscript output : 15 29 Missing stdout : Differing stdout : 23 ocaml Missing examples : Differing postscript output : 15 29 31 Missing stdout : Differing stdout : 31
I created this result with "make -j3 test" in the install tree which is much faster than running the equivalent test using the "ctest" command in the build tree if you have a multi-processor box. This result represents a large improvement and extension of the example implementations over the last few days mostly due to Andrew's efforts. I assume the Ada and OCaml issues will be straightforward to resolve because those languages have been perfect in the recent past. Perl/PDL has also been perfect in the recent past and is almost perfect now. The remaining perl stdout difference for example 31 should be resolved as soon as some straightforward fixes that I have discussed off-list with Doug are implemented for the external PDL::Graphics::PLplot module. Andrew and I are currently investigating the PostScript differences for tcl using ndiff. Some are just rounding, but others sometimes appear to be something more depending on platform. The remaining issues are due to example 19 and have historically been difficult to resolve. This extension to our testing framework for PLPlot now covers most of our common API and should make it much easier to maintain PLPlot. I have written a paragraph about that important step forward in README.release. Alan __________________________ Alan W. Irwin Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca). Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software package (plplot.org); the libLASi project (unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net). __________________________ Linux-powered Science __________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
