On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Andrew
Ross<andrewr...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Technically this is akin to an API change since some of these symbols
> have been visible for a long time (pre cmake I think) and so some
> users might rely on then. This is what I wanted feedback on.
We could still install plConfig.h but remove all references to it from
user-visible headers. Thus users who rely on it could include it
themselves.
Also, it would be better to hide all internal declarations altogether.
It could be easily done like this: in all sources we define a macro,
say IN_PLPLOT_CORE and check for it in all headers. All internal
stuff in headers should be guarded #if IN_PLPLOT_CODE ... #endif. The
macro can be defined on the command-line of compiler,
-DIN_PLPLOT_CORE=1, so only modifications to headers is necessary.
Dmitri
--
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com>*/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
