On 2011-03-06 19:58-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote: > OCaml should be matching more closely now:
Hi Hez: The C implementation of the range adjustment sucked in an obvious way so I had to change it and all other implementations of example 27 including the OCaml one. Since I am floundering around with the OCaml language (programming by analogy rather than from any knowledge of what I am doing) could you review my x27.ml change (revision 11613)? That revision does give the same answer as C, but it strikes me that the "style" of the xmin, xmax, ymin, and ymax reference logic is quite distinct from all other floating point calculations so you may want to change it to be consistent with the rest. Furthermore, I don't understand at all why xmin, etc., must be initialized since that happens in any case for i==0. But if I dropped that "unneeded" initialization the ocaml compiler complained. So I left it in with a comment. Alan __________________________ Alan W. Irwin Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca). Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software package (plplot.org); the libLASi project (unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net). __________________________ Linux-powered Science __________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
