FWIW, I don't think we should delay the release, but instead just release with a note that there were major low-level changes, so users should expect more bugs than usual.
Robby On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:54 PM, John Clements <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: > > On May 22, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:14 PM, John Clements >> <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: >>> >>> On May 22, 2009, at 12:04 PM, Robby Findler wrote: >>> >>>> Are you quoting my message specifically for a reason? >>> >>> Honestly, the reason that your message prompted my response was that I >>> just >>> fixed a bug in the stepper that I asked Eli to add to the release, and >>> this >>> code clearly wasn't in the code that you tested. That makes me nervous. >> >> But I don't test the stepper...? > > True. > >>>> And major version bumps are when things are least stable, not most >>>> stable! >>> >>> Yes, but I suspect that major version bumps are those that elicit the >>> "ooh, >>> maybe I should try upgrading this thing!" response from casual users. >> >> Perhaps I'm just old now, but I usually refuse to upgrade until the >> small number is at least 2. :) > > Yep. > > If no one else is concerned, I don't have a problem. > > John > > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
