On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:30 PM, David Van Horn <dvanh...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > Eli Barzilay wrote: >> >> And BTW, these are two votes -- I expected many more people to say >> something given how many people wanted to see this thing in. > > I think the srfi/1 module should be compatible with SRFI 1. The scheme/list > version should do whatever the PLT consensus is. I like mandatory 2 > arguments.
I agree -- srfi/1 should be compatible with SRFI 1, and I prefer a mandatory 2-argument make-list. If we only want to maintain one version of the function, I wouldn't object to re-exporting the srfi/1 version from scheme/list. I don't think we should make up a new version with a different default value, however. Having one that defaults to #f and another that defaults to 0, #<void>, #<undefined>, #<eof>, NIL, or anything else of the sort, would just be confusing. -- Carl Eastlund _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
