OK, I committed this change, and will merge to 4.2. One (smaller)
problem stays: since scheme/list and srfi/1 are incompatible,
requiring both needs some manual filtering because of this change.
(But it required thse anyway because of other impossible to unify
bindings like `map' and `for-each'.)
On May 22, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I think just the `srfi/1' implementation should change, and #f seems
> like a fine default --- useless, but compatible.
>
> At Fri, 22 May 2009 13:28:45 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > The problem is that this leaves us with an incompatible srfi/1 (which
> > is why I wrote the second option). (BTW, I wouldn't mind such
> > incompatibility, but I don't care about `make-list' anyway.)
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://www.barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
