On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Matthew Flatt<mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > At Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:13:32 -0400, Carl Eastlund wrote: >> Running make install, I get a long series of errors of this form: >> >> /Users/cce/plt/trunk/doc/algol60/in.sxref::0: read (compiled): code >> compiled for version 4.2.1.5, not 4.2.1.6 >> /Users/cce/plt/trunk/doc/browser/in.sxref::0: read (compiled): code >> compiled for version 4.2.1.5, not 4.2.1.6 >> /Users/cce/plt/trunk/doc/cards/in.sxref::0: read (compiled): code >> compiled for version 4.2.1.5, not 4.2.1.6 >> . >> . >> . >> >> What's going on here? Shouldn't setup-plt / make install be >> rebuilding these? I got these yesterday during a setup-plt -D as >> well, which is confusing because they appear to be documentation files >> and I would expect them to be excluded from setup-plt -D. > > Yes, that's puzzling. > > Just to make sure, what are the timestamps on "algol60_scrbl.zo", > "algol60/index.html", "algol60/in.sxref", and "algol60/out.sxref"?
-rw-r--r-- 1 cce cce 7901 Aug 11 10:28 collects/algol60/compiled/algol60_scrbl.zo -rw-r--r-- 1 cce cce 453 Aug 11 11:19 doc/algol60/in.sxref -rw-r--r-- 1 cce cce 11165 Aug 10 13:01 doc/algol60/index.html -rw-r--r-- 1 cce cce 2599 Aug 11 11:19 doc/algol60/out.sxref > Where in the Setup PLT output do those warnings appear (with and > without `-D', if possible)? During both 'setup-plt -D' and 'make install' they occurred in the middle of setting up my development links; Dracula in particular, in between building the fasttest/private directory (from the FastTest package, a dependency of Dracula) and the dracula/reference/modular directory (which contains only a .scrbl file). I'm not sure if building .scrbl files is expected or not for -D, either, but my -D builds always go through long compiles in some of my reference documentation directories anyway. --Carl _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
