At Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:31:31 -0400, Carl Eastlund wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Matthew Flatt<mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > > At Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:13:32 -0400, Carl Eastlund wrote: > >> Running make install, I get a long series of errors of this form: > >> > >> /Users/cce/plt/trunk/doc/algol60/in.sxref::0: read (compiled): code > >> compiled for version 4.2.1.5, not 4.2.1.6 > >> /Users/cce/plt/trunk/doc/browser/in.sxref::0: read (compiled): code > >> compiled for version 4.2.1.5, not 4.2.1.6 > >> /Users/cce/plt/trunk/doc/cards/in.sxref::0: read (compiled): code > >> compiled for version 4.2.1.5, not 4.2.1.6 > >> . > >> . > >> . > >> > >> What's going on here? Shouldn't setup-plt / make install be > >> rebuilding these? I got these yesterday during a setup-plt -D as > >> well, which is confusing because they appear to be documentation files > >> and I would expect them to be excluded from setup-plt -D. > > > > Yes, that's puzzling. > > > > Just to make sure, what are the timestamps on "algol60_scrbl.zo", > > "algol60/index.html", "algol60/in.sxref", and "algol60/out.sxref"? > > -rw-r--r-- 1 cce cce 7901 Aug 11 10:28 > collects/algol60/compiled/algol60_scrbl.zo > -rw-r--r-- 1 cce cce 453 Aug 11 11:19 doc/algol60/in.sxref > -rw-r--r-- 1 cce cce 11165 Aug 10 13:01 doc/algol60/index.html > -rw-r--r-- 1 cce cce 2599 Aug 11 11:19 doc/algol60/out.sxref
Still puzzling. I guess the ".sxref" files were updated because there was a doc build (maybe for a planet package?) after `setup-plt -D'. But then the files should have the right version. The ".sxref" files really do start with the old version number, right? > > Where in the Setup PLT output do those warnings appear (with and > > without `-D', if possible)? > > During both 'setup-plt -D' and 'make install' they occurred in the > middle of setting up my development links; Dracula in particular, in > between building the fasttest/private directory (from the FastTest > package, a dependency of Dracula) and the dracula/reference/modular > directory (which contains only a .scrbl file). I haven't yet managed to reproduce the problem. Does it happen with the current Planet version of "fasttest.plt"? > I'm not sure if > building .scrbl files is expected or not for -D, either, but my -D > builds always go through long compiles in some of my reference > documentation directories anyway. ".scrbl" files are compiled even if you supply -D, since -D currently only controls rendering. Now that you mention it, though, ".scrbl" files could be skipped when you supply -D, and I'll look into that change. In any case, I don't see why ".sxref" files would be needed when compiling ".scrbl" files, unless some for-syntax module explicitly loads cross-reference information (e.g., though `load-collections-xref' from `setup/xref'). _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
