[changed to plt-dev] On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> wrote: >> [It seems to me define-coercion-match-expander is useful enough to belong in >> scheme/match.] > > I'm cool with that if others and Sam are. I'm also not super attached > to the name, but it is what I thought of at the time.
I totally agree - it seems very useful. If someone comes up with a better name, I'll use it, otherwise I'll just add it with the current name. -- sam th [email protected] _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
