+1
Jos
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sam Tobin-Hochstadt" <[email protected]>
To: "Jay McCarthy" <[email protected]>
Cc: "PLT Developers" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 5:21 PM
Subject: [plt-dev] Re: [plt-scheme] match for Promise
[changed to plt-dev]
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Jay McCarthy <[email protected]>
wrote:
[It seems to me define-coercion-match-expander is useful enough to
belong in scheme/match.]
I'm cool with that if others and Sam are. I'm also not super attached
to the name, but it is what I thought of at the time.
I totally agree - it seems very useful. If someone comes up with a
better name, I'll use it, otherwise I'll just add it with the current
name.
--
sam th
[email protected]
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Se certificó que el correo entrante no contiene virus.
Comprobada por AVG - www.avg.es
Versión: 9.0.733 / Base de datos de virus: 271.1.1/2716 - Fecha de la
versión: 03/01/10 08:34:00
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
