-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Someone asked me what I would think, hypothetically, of a feature that
> would enforce the GPL. I explained why that would not be wrong--but, as
> far as I know, nobody in this discussion is seriously considering such a
> project.
That would be an incorrect assumption. In fact, in my meeting with
the CEO of a company found to be violating the GPL with Plucker source code
(with our FSF-appointed attorney present), I came up with a method, which
was agreed-upon, whereby the GPL could be presented as a "clickwrap" type of
license, and if you disagreed, the application would not launch. I'll go
into detail off-list, if you are interested, RMS.
d.
perldoc -qa.j | perl -lpe '($_)=m("(.*)")'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.1.92 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9pf9ekRQERnB1rkoRAkn7AKCmbualMewr0/DFlC20PPyL62kBNwCgoJK6
xlHGc6UXE9K1CB3jCnIhZGY=
=U2Ly
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
