On 20 Nov 2002 at 0:55, MJ Ray wrote: > Robert O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -Others: maybe the "marquee" tag from MSIE 3.x days, and all the other non- > > standard crap that has come and gone over the years. > > Yes! We want <blink> in Plucker now!
I enjoyed the Python comment next to the 'blink' on the list of currently unimplemented tags in the Parser (TextParser.py, around line 855). Props to whoever wrote that in. > Seriously, has anyone who asks for support for standards-breaking actually > thought the effect of it through to a conclusion? I think Plucker should be > praised for taking a reasonably pure-standards approach on this. It's the > only way that you can hope to keep things sane *and* moving forwards. I agree 100%. I am amazed that any web designer which has struggled with the pain of having to deal with the woes of proprietary browser tags in years gone by, and is now working on Plucker with a bona- fide chance to shape their own future of their distribution medium tools, would opt for pollution of them by standards-breaking non-HTML. Best wishes, Robert _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
