On Sun, Mar 09, 2003, Adam McDaniel wrote:
> I've attached a diff as a preliminary implementation of
> horizontally layering images.
But that code only handles *inlined* images. An inlined image is not
a problem, since you only draw the image and then "forget" it.
However, to handle the large pannable version you would need
something else and that is what I'm talking about. You can see my
suggestion at
http://www.plkr.org/list/2Q2000/0132.html
Keep in mind that it was written in June 2000 and the idea would
most likely need some changes...
> Fortunatly, I see no reason as of why this would take up any more
> memory this way then if there were actually that many images nativly
> references in the document itself..., other than the linked list but
> that's only temporary.
The images don't take up any extra memory at all, since we don't have
to "remember" anything for inlined images. I'm not sure you would even
have to use a list to implement this...
/Mike
_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
