plucker-dev  

Messages by Date

• 2003/03/18 Re: Small bug in text display code. Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/18 Makefile on MacOS X (was: Plucker 1.3 features, building and suggestions) Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/18 Plucker 1.3 features, building and suggestions George Harker
• 2003/03/17 Small bug in text display code. Ivan Tkatchev
• 2003/03/15 Re: More table questions Chris Hawks
• 2003/03/12 Re: More table questions Chris Hawks
• 2003/03/12 Re: More table questions Laurens M. Fridael
• 2003/03/12 Re: More table questions Robert O'Connor
• 2003/03/12 Re: More table questions Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/12 Re: More table questions Laurens M. Fridael
• 2003/03/12 Re: More table questions Chris Hawks
• 2003/03/12 More table questions Laurens M. Fridael
• 2003/03/11 Re: Please announce new versions in Plucker-announce Fringe Ryder
• 2003/03/11 Re: Danish updated for plucker-desktop Robert O'Connor
• 2003/03/11 Re: Please announce new versions in Plucker-announce Robert O'Connor
• 2003/03/11 Please announce new versions in Plucker-announce Ken Stuart
• 2003/03/11 Please announce new versions in Plucker-announce Ken Stuart
• 2003/03/11 Re: Table questions Chris Hawks
• 2003/03/11 Re: Table questions Robert O'Connor
• 2003/03/11 Table questions Laurens M. Fridael
• 2003/03/11 Re: Large pannable tables >64kb (Addition to proposed solution to 64k image limitation) Chris Hawks
• 2003/03/11 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/10 Re: Large pannable tables >64kb (Addition to proposed solution to 64k image limitation) Bill Janssen
• 2003/03/10 Re: MultiImage specification Bill Janssen
• 2003/03/10 Re: Large pannable tables >64kb (Addition to proposed solution to64k image limitation) Taras
• 2003/03/10 Re: Large pannable tables >64kb (Addition to proposed solution to 64k image limitation) Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/10 MultiImage specification Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/10 Large pannable tables >64kb (Addition to proposed solution to 64k image limitation) Robert O'Connor
• 2003/03/10 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Bill Janssen
• 2003/03/10 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Bill Janssen
• 2003/03/10 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Bill Janssen
• 2003/03/10 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/10 Re: Advantages to Plucker I can cite ? David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/03/10 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/03/10 Advantages to Plucker I can cite ? Ken Stuart
• 2003/03/10 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/10 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Taras
• 2003/03/10 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Laurens M. Fridael
• 2003/03/10 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Laurens M. Fridael
• 2003/03/10 Re: Deleting documents while set to Manual update Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/10 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/10 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/10 Re: Deleting documents while set to Manual update Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/09 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Ken Stuart
• 2003/03/09 RE: Deleting documents while set to Manual update David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/03/09 RE: Deleting documents while set to Manual update Dennis McCunney
• 2003/03/09 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/03/09 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/03/09 Re: Deleting documents while set to Manual update David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/03/09 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/09 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/09 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/09 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Laurens M. Fridael
• 2003/03/09 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/09 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Laurens M. Fridael
• 2003/03/09 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Robert O'Connor
• 2003/03/09 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/09 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/09 Re: proposed solution to 64k image limitation Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/09 proposed solution to 64k image limitation Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/08 Re: Deleting documents while set to Manual update Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/08 Re: Deleting documents while set to Manual update Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/08 Deleting documents while set to Manual update David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/03/07 Re: HiRes Viewer: Possible image display bug Robert O'Connor
• 2003/03/07 Re: HiRes Viewer: Possible image display bug Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/07 HiRes Viewer: Possible image display bug Ken Stuart
• 2003/03/06 Re: XML parser patch Bill Janssen
• 2003/03/06 XML parser patch Dave
• 2003/03/06 Why is the indent so large for <ol> elements in CVS parser? Robert O'Connor
• 2003/03/04 Re: header file path problems John Marshall
• 2003/03/04 Re: header file path problems Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/04 re: header file path problems Eugene Y. Vasserman
• 2003/03/04 Re: Why netscape? (was: Explode/unpluck error, fixed..) Bill Janssen
• 2003/03/04 Re: Why netscape? (was: Explode/unpluck error, fixed..) Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/04 Re: Why netscape? (was: Explode/unpluck error, fixed..) Bill Janssen
• 2003/03/04 Re: Why netscape? (was: Explode/unpluck error, fixed..) David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/03/04 Why netscape? (was: Explode/unpluck error, fixed..) Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/04 Re: Explode/unpluck error, fixed.. Bill Nalen
• 2003/03/04 Explode/unpluck error, fixed.. David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/03/04 Re: question about building hires under cygwin Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/04 Re: question about building hires under cygwin Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/04 Re: question about building hires under cygwin Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/03/03 re: question about building hires under cygwin David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/03/03 re: question about building hires under cygwin Eugene Y. Vasserman
• 2003/03/03 Re: Commerical Applications MJ Ray
• 2003/03/02 Re: question about building hires under cygwin Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/02 SUPPORT FOR MAC OS X SANDOR REICH
• 2003/03/02 question about building hires under cygwin Eugene Y. Vasserman
• 2003/03/02 Re: DIY hires builds Adam McDaniel
• 2003/03/02 DIY hires builds Eugene Y. Vasserman
• 2003/03/02 Re: Commerical Applications Robert O'Connor
• 2003/03/02 Re: Commerical Applications Robert O'Connor
• 2003/03/02 Re: Commerical Applications David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/03/02 Re: Commerical Applications Branko Strok
• 2003/03/01 Re: Commerical Applications Bill Nalen
• 2003/03/01 re: Commerical Applications Robert O'Connor
• 2003/03/01 Re: Commerical Applications Robert O'Connor
• 2003/03/01 Re: Commerical Applications Laurens M. Fridael
• 2003/02/28 RE: Commerical Applications Wesley Mason
• 2003/02/28 Commerical Applications Kevin Bolduan
• 2003/02/28 Re: To fry a fish... (was: GPL code question) David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/28 Re: To fry a fish... (was: GPL code question) Laurens M. Fridael
• 2003/02/28 Re: To fry a fish... (was: GPL code question) David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/28 To fry a fish... (was: GPL code question) Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/28 Re: GPL code question Chris Hawks
• 2003/02/28 Re: GPL code question Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/28 Re: GPL code question David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/28 GPL code question Bill Nalen
• 2003/02/28 Re: fix prc-tools 2.x URL (patch to REQUIREMENTS etc) John Marshall
• 2003/02/27 fix prc-tools 2.x URL (patch to REQUIREMENTS etc) John Marshall
• 2003/02/27 Re: Couple of db format doc suggestions Bill Janssen
• 2003/02/27 Windows explode Edward Rayl
• 2003/02/27 Re: Couple of db format doc suggestions Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/27 Re: Couple of db format doc suggestions Chris Hawks
• 2003/02/27 Couple of db format doc suggestions Bill Nalen
• 2003/02/27 Re: fix prc-tools 2.x URL (patch to REQUIREMENTS etc) Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/26 Re: fix prc-tools 2.x URL (patch to REQUIREMENTS etc) Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/26 fix prc-tools 2.x URL (patch to REQUIREMENTS etc) John Marshall
• 2003/02/26 Re: patch to viewer/configure.in John Marshall
• 2003/02/25 Re: Table Compression Chris Hawks
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) Fringe Ryder
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) Fringe Ryder
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) Robert O'Connor
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) Fringe Ryder
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) Fringe Ryder
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/25 Re: patch to viewer/configure.in Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/25 Re: robots.txt MJ Ray
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/25 Re: Table Compression Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/25 Re: robots.txt David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/25 Re: Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) Fringe Ryder
• 2003/02/25 robots.txt Blake Winton
• 2003/02/25 Re: CVS log message list? David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/25 Re: http://sourceforge.net/projects/plucker/ David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/25 Cygwin filename case insensitivity in gcc (Was: patch to viewer/configure.in) David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/24 Re: http://sourceforge.net/projects/plucker/ MJ Ray
• 2003/02/24 CVS log message list? David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/24 http://sourceforge.net/projects/plucker/ David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to REQUIREMENTS file Bill Janssen
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to viewer/configure.in Bill Janssen
• 2003/02/24 Table Compression Chris Hawks
• 2003/02/24 Re: Release plans? Chris Hawks
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to REQUIREMENTS file mailinglists
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to REQUIREMENTS file David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to REQUIREMENTS file David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to REQUIREMENTS file David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/24 Re: Release plans? Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to REQUIREMENTS file Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to REQUIREMENTS file David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/24 Re: Release plans? Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to REQUIREMENTS file Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to REQUIREMENTS file Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to viewer/configure.in David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to REQUIREMENTS file David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to REQUIREMENTS file David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to viewer/configure.in David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/24 Release plans? Laurens M. Fridael
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to REQUIREMENTS file Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/24 Re: patch to viewer/configure.in Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/23 Re: patch to viewer/configure.in Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/23 Re: patch to viewer/configure.in David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/23 Re: patch to REQUIREMENTS file Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/23 Re: patch to viewer/configure.in Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/23 patch to viewer/configure.in David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/23 patch to autogen.sh David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/23 patch to configure.in David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/23 patch to REQUIREMENTS file David Starks-Browning
• 2003/02/23 Re: Back button (was: Better support for future OS versions) Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/23 Re: Back button (was: Better support for future OS versions) Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/23 Back button (was: Better support for future OS versions) Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/22 Re: Better support for future OS versions Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/22 Better support for future OS versions Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/21 Re: Tiny Fonts and Pilrc David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/21 Tiny Fonts and Pilrc Ludovic Drolez
• 2003/02/20 Re: pdf2html Daniel Thompson
• 2003/02/20 Re: plucker-build and 16bpp Rob OConnor
• 2003/02/20 Re: "Creating Teenee Tiny Fonts in OS 5" Ben Combee
• 2003/02/20 Re: "Creating Teenee Tiny Fonts in OS 5" Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/20 Re: "Creating Teenee Tiny Fonts in OS 5" Ben Combee
• 2003/02/20 Re: "Creating Teenee Tiny Fonts in OS 5" Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/20 plucker-build and 16bpp Nicolas Bouthors
• 2003/02/20 Re: "Creating Teenee Tiny Fonts in OS 5" David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/20 Re: "Creating Teenee Tiny Fonts in OS 5" Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/20 Re: "Creating Teenee Tiny Fonts in OS 5" David A. Desrosiers
• 2003/02/20 Re: "Creating Teenee Tiny Fonts in OS 5" Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/20 Re: "Creating Teenee Tiny Fonts in OS 5" Michael Nordstr�m
• 2003/02/19 Re: recent CVS updates Adam McDaniel
• 2003/02/19 RE: recent CVS updates Bob Lyons

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]